Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:20:37 +0200, Lachlan Hunt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would others accept changing the methods to cssQuery() and
cssQueryOne()? If this would achieve concensus, I'd be willing to use
these names.
Opera does not like the cssQuery names and prefers the names that were
suggested in Lachy's draft.
I recall strong objection to names which suggested this was about CSS in
the past (but maybe it was only Anne objecting) on the basis that this
isn't about CSS but selectors.
So, Bjoern, Maciej, do you object to closing the issue with the names
Lachy proposed in his draft, or are you just tossing in another idea in
case it gets stronger consensus?
I'm not really a big fan of anything containing 'css' either. But then
again I don't think the length is as critical as many others seem to.
Admittedly I'm not a big fan of the selectElement/selectAllElements
suggestions either for the reasons maciej raised (similarities to
selectNodes/selectSingleNode).
How about selectorQuery/selectorQuerySingle/selectorQueryAll ?
/ Jonas
