On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:32:56 +0100, Robert Green <rg...@iinet.net.au>
wrote:
I have been told that the reason for not having live collections is for
performance, but I find that hard to understand. The current live
collections are much faster than their native javascript emulations, I
can't see that getting a collection every time it is required will be
faster than getting it once and using it many times.
This is in fact the reason they are static. Browser implementors indicated
that doing this live would not perform well due to the relative complexity
of Selectors.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
