Oracle does not support the substance of the current Web Storage draft [1][2][3]. This is a path-breaking change to the Web applications platform and rushing such a major change without substantive consideration of alternatives is not in its own best interest. Oracle does not see it fit to advance the current draft along the recommendation track

Still, we believe that the working group will benefit greatly from the wide review of this draft. Has the chair exhausted all such alternatives such as Working Group Note? At the very least the status needs to be clear about the purpose of publishing the document. A boilerplate status is not appropriate since there are important concerns about the technique used for structured storage in the draft.

Nikunj Mehta

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/0131.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/0136.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/0137.html

On Apr 2, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the First Public Working Draft of the specs below.

As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for comments is April 10.

-Regards, Art Barstow


Begin forwarded message:

From: ext Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch>
Date: April 1, 2009 6:22:40 PM EDT
To: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Subject: Request for FPWD publication of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/pine.lnx.4.62.0904012208150.25...@hixie.dreamhostps.com >


The following drafts are relatively stable and would benefit greatly from
wider review:

  Server-Sent Events
  http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/

  The Web Sockets API
  http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/

  Web Storage
  http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/

  Web Workers
  http://dev.w3.org/html5/workers/

Assuming there is consensus in the working group to do so, could we
publish these as First Public Working Drafts?

Cheers,
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E ) \._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _ \ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'-- (,_..'`-.;.'





Reply via email to