+1
I don't see the need for that paragraph.
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On Apr 29, 2009, at 6:36 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote:
Hi Frederick,
Some tiny editorial changes....
I think we should add the following sub-section to the Status of
This Document:
[[
<h3 class="no-num no-toc">Note to Last Call Reviewers</h3>
<p><em>This section is non-normative.</em></p>
<p>The editors of this specification respond rapidly to all feedback
and continuously make corrections to this document. Unless you are
reading this document on the date of publication, <strong
class="redNote">it is extremely likely that this document has been
superseded</strong>. Instead of reviewing this published draft,
please
review the <a href="http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-
digsig/">latest
editor's draft</a> and make sure to cite the date of that draft in
the
feedback sent to the Web Apps Working Group's public mailing list <a
href=
"mailto:public-webapps@w3.org";>public-Webapps@w3.org</a>. </p>
<p>Please also be sure to check the mailing list <a href=
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/";>archive</a> to
see if any issues uncovered have already been addressed. To help with
cataloging issues, prefix emails to the mailing list with the string
<samp>[widgets]</samp>. Any and all feedback is welcomed.</p>
]]
Well... Doesn't "Last Call" suggest that you're actually beyond the
phase of rapid changes?
