On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Pierre-Antoine LaFayette <pierre.lafaye...@gmail.com> wrote: > Adam, could you provide your thoughts on using about:icon?
I'd prefer not to use about:icon, but I don't think it matters much. Currently, the only URL in the about scheme that's accessible to web content is about:blank. I believe Internet Explorer has a "res" scheme that might be more appropriate. That's a general way to refer to browser-provided resources with URLs. Perhaps res:icon?ext=html&size=32 At a higher level, we could bikeshed about the name forever. You should pick whatever you think is most aesthetic since you're driving the process. Adam
