On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:34:42 +0900, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote:
It looks ok to me, though somewhat lacking on details. What happens if
you call
x = new XMLHttpRequest("foopy");
or
x = new XMLHttpRequest(undefined);
See Web IDL.
You should probably define that the 'anon' argument is a boolean so
that the normal conversion rules automatically are applied.
See the Web IDL fragment in the specification.
I'm also wondering if the UMP guys are happy with this syntax.
I haven't gotten feedback on it so far.
There has been suggestions of changing header names. I'm not a big fan
of the current names, but if we're going to fix them, i'd rather see a
coherent strategy for all CORS headers than random spot fixes.
Does that mean you would be willing to remove support for the current
header
names? If not I'm not sure if it is worth it. But if you are I will
make a
proposal.
Yeah, the goal would definitely be to drop the old header names. We
probably couldn't drop them right away, but would need a phase-out
period. I think this would still be doable, but the longer we wait the
less that is going to be true.
Also, it requires everyone to be on board with this change, including
webkit and Microsoft.
Okay.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
