On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote:
> A draft of the proposed API is here: > > http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfs2skx2_4g3s5f857 I just noticed another nit. Your proposal says "interface IDBIndex { }; // Unchanged" but the spec's IDBIndex interface includes "readonly attribute DOMString storeName <#widl-IDBIndex-storeName>;" which is the owning object store's name. This param is probably no longer necessary now that indexes hang off of objectStores (and thus it's pretty clear which one an index is associated with). J
