On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> >> Given the information below, I think it would be useful to move this >> spec to a "test-ready" state. That is, publish it as a Last Call Working >> Draft now and if there are known issues, document them in the Status of >> the Document Section. Then, after a fixed review period, if no >> substantial changes are agreed, the spec can be moved to Candidate >> Recommendation and work on a test suite can begin. Naturally, if major >> changes are agreed, the spec will need to return to Working Draft. > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: > >> Given the information below, I think it would be useful to move this >> spec to a "test-ready" state. That is, publish it as a Last Call Working >> Draft now and if there are known issues, document them in the Status of >> the Document Section. Then, after a fixed review period, if no >> substantial changes are agreed, the spec can be moved to Candidate >> Recommendation and work on a test suite can begin. Naturally, if major >> changes are agreed, the spec will need to return to Working Draft. > > I'll defer to Tab for these.
I'll do the necessary edits for publishing tomorrow. ~TJ
