On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > * What is the latest implementation status of the XBL2 CR [XBL2-CR] and > Hixie's September 2010 version [XBL-ED] (previously referred to as > "XBL2-cutdown")?
I'm not aware of any new developments on either front. > * Which members of WebApps want to continue with the XML-based version > of XBL2 as codified in the XBL2 CR? If you are groupin this , what firm > commitments can you make to push the spec along the REC track? Would you > object to the Forms WG taking over this spec? I have no objections to anyone continuing down such a path (the spec is under a Creative Commons license to allow anyone to do just that). I would ask that people use another name if they did, though, to avoid confusion. > * Which members of WebApps want to continue with the non-XML version as > Hixie created last September? If you are in this group, what firm > commitments can you make to push this version along the REC track > (especially implementation)? > > * Should the WG pursue Dimitri Glazkov's Component Model proposal > [Component]? If yes, who is willing to commit to work on that spec? I expect XBL and Dimitri's work will evolve together and eventually end up being features specified in the HTML spec. HTH, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'