Hi Tab, All - can you Tab, or someone else, commit to processing the
comments and bugs for the Workers LCWD?
Given Hixie's bug list [1], perhaps we shouldn't wait for him.
-Art
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0385.html
On Apr/28/2011 1:35 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hixie, All,
April 21 was the comment deadline for the March 10 LCWD of the Web
Workers spec [WW-LC].
Since that LC was published, I noted 2 set of comments and 2 new bugs:
* Adrian Bateman; 9-Mar-2011
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0877.html
* Travis Leithead; 20-Apr-2011
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0269.html
* Bug-12067; Jonas Sicking; 14-Feb-2011
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12067
* Bug-12340; Olli Pettay; 19-Mar-2011
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12340
Hixie - what normative changes have been made in the ED [WW-ED] (since
the LC was published) that would affect an implementation based on the
March 10 LC?
The Process Document defines the requirements for processing LC
comments [LC] and the WG's main requirement is to respond to all
comments.
It appears there is no agreed conclusion to the two comments nor to
Bug-12067 and there were no responses to Bug-12340.
-ArtB
[WW-LC] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-workers-20110310/
[WW-ED] http://dev.w3.org/html5/workers/
[LC]http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call