On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Aryeh Gregor <a...@aryeh.name> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: >> I agree with this, but it might be too late to make this change. >> >> The problem is that if we returned an Array object, it would not have >> a .item function, which the currently returned NodeList has. >> >> I guess we could return a Array object and add a .item function to it. > > Or return a NodeList and add .forEach/.filter/etc. to it?
That works, but what is the advantage? And .push/.pop or other mutating functions wouldn't work. / Jonas
