On 25 août 2011, at 08:33, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Aryeh Gregor <a...@aryeh.name> wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: >>> I agree with this, but it might be too late to make this change. >>> >>> The problem is that if we returned an Array object, it would not have >>> a .item function, which the currently returned NodeList has. >>> >>> I guess we could return a Array object and add a .item function to it. >> >> Or return a NodeList and add .forEach/.filter/etc. to it? > > That works, but what is the advantage? And .push/.pop or other > mutating functions wouldn't work.
All mutable functions will work (forEach, map, etc.) and bring a better expressiveness to the code. >