On 2011-11-22 14:09, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 11/22/11 8:05 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
The current draft of Selectors 4 includes :matches(), though, which can
partially handle that case, excluding :not([type]), which would have to
be left separate.
That seems like a bug in :matches() that just needs fixing if it's meant
as a replacement for :any().
Actually, I'm mistaken. The spec says that :matches() can't be used
within :not(), rather than the other way around.
--
Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software
http://lachy.id.au/
http://www.opera.com/
