On 01/06/2012 10:28 PM, Jarred Nicholls wrote:
This is an editor's draft of a spec, it's not a recommendation, so it's hardly a violation of anything.
With this kind of attitude, frankly, you shouldn't be implementing a spec. HTH Ms2ger
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json" Jarred Nicholls
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json" Jarred Nicholls
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json" Jarred Nicholls
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json" Glenn Maynard
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json" Julian Reschke
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json" Boris Zbarsky
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json" Julian Reschke
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json" Jarred Nicholls
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json" Boris Zbarsky
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json" Jarred Nicholls
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json&q... Ms2ger
- Re: [XHR] responseType "js... Jarred Nicholls
- Re: [XHR] responseType "js... Tab Atkins Jr.
- Re: [XHR] responseType "js... Jarred Nicholls
- Re: [XHR] responseType "js... Julian Reschke
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json&q... Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [XHR] responseType "js... Jarred Nicholls
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json" Ojan Vafai
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json&q... Tab Atkins Jr.
- Re: [XHR] responseType "js... Glenn Maynard
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json" Glenn Maynard
