On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Glenn Maynard <gl...@zewt.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote: > >> I would suggest using a different name than "URLObject". I think that >> name will cause a lot of head scratching. >> > > No disagreement there; that was just a placeholder. I'd suggest waiting > for further input from Anne, Jonas and Arun (the editors of the specs in > question) before spending much time coming up with a name, though. sure... i don't have a suggested replacement, but i know a bad name when i see one; i'll defer to the editors to come up with something reasonable