On 12/02/2012 01:38 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 12/1/12 3:34 PM, ext Ms2ger wrote:
I object to this publication because of this change:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/rev/2341e31323a4
For a couple of years now, if a spec proposed for publication in TR
includes a normative reference that hahas published as a TR, PLH has
insisted the reference needs to be a W3C document (TR or ED). (I'm
pretty sure a small number of references to non W3C documents slipped
through but I consider those mistakes.)
I asked Jungkee to make the reference changes to the TR versions so
thanks Jungkee for the patch.
It would be OK with me if the references were changed to W3C EDs. Would
that take care of your objection?
No. I'd love to hear from plh why he would not leave decisions like
these to the WG.
Ms2ger
