On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen <hallv...@opera.com> wrote: > TL;DR: I'm not aware of evidence that spec'ing this is required for compat, I > do buy the argument that precision might cause better future compat, I'm > however concerned about back compat and find it surprising that a strictly > spec'ed implementation detail will sometimes transform the case the script > actually used.
Yeah, we might have to preserve casing of the encoding label if there's a (byte case-insensitive) match to begin with. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
