is it possible to send mail to www-internatio...@w3.org each time
someone adds somethign to the github issue? (this is the list where we
track and discuss issues).
if so, i see no real difference between using github or bugzilla – our
process is designed to cope with both bugzilla and email based comments
(though it would normally be better to start with the right one rather
than switch part way, so changing the SOD would indeed help).
we should also ensure, however, that the titles of the issues and any
associated notification mails always contain the i18n-issue-xxx string
that will allow us and tracker to locate information for a given thread.
ri
On 20/03/2015 16:40, Christiansen, Kenneth R wrote:
Marcos, Anssi, what do you think?
I would prefer the comments on GitHub as it seems to be a great place for
interacting with the web community, judging from our success so far.
Kenneth
-----Original Message-----
From: Phillips, Addison [mailto:addi...@lab126.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:43 PM
To: Christiansen, Kenneth R; public-webapps@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org
Subject: RE: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications"
Hi Kenneth,
Thanks for the reply.
I know you're using GitHub. However, whenever I'm filing/forwarding
comments on a document on behalf of the Working Group, I always look at
the SOTD in the document in question to see what instructions the receiving
WG has. In this case, you have a fairly generic SOTD, which says in part:
--
This document was published by the Web Applications (WebApps) Working
Group as a Working Draft. This document is intended to become a W3C
Recommendation. If you wish to make comments regarding this document,
please send them to public-webapps@w3.org (subscribe, archives). All
comments are welcome.
--
If you prefer to have comments filed to GitHub, perhaps modify your
instructions?
Thanks!
Addison
Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect (Amazon Lab126)
Chair (W3C I18N WG)
Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.
-----Original Message-----
From: Christiansen, Kenneth R
[mailto:kenneth.r.christian...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 1:15 AM
To: Phillips, Addison; public-webapps@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org
Subject: RE: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications"
Hi there,
The spec authors use GitHub for issue tracking. I duplicated your issues
there:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues
Thanks for looking into internationalization issues with the current spec.
Cheers,
Kenneth
-----Original Message-----
From: Phillips, Addison [mailto:addi...@lab126.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 6:20 PM
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org
Subject: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications"
Hello Webapps,
As previously mentioned, I am about to send you comments from the
Internationalization Working Group on your document (whose current
iteration lives at [1]). Because we use Tracker for our comments, I
will be sending each comment under separate cover. The I18N WG is
always happy to discuss our comments or ways to address same. Please
let me know if you prefer to receive comments in a different format
(such as Bugzilla) or if you need additional information.
If you want to see a summary of our comments, you can find them
tracked at [2]
Regards (for I18N)
Addison
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/appmanifest/ [2]
http://www.w3.org/International/track/products/74
Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect (Amazon Lab126) Chair (W3C I18N WG)
Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.
