Dean, One gap in the current Bylaws is that it is not clear that Associate Members can participate in Working Groups and the Public mailing list. It should probably be clarified that Associate Members have all the privileges of Interested Parties.
Thanks, Peter > On Mar 17, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Dean Coclin <[email protected]> wrote: > > You’re talking about BR changes. I’m just looking at Bylaw changes for this > ballot. > > From: Doug Beattie [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 1:46 PM > To: Stephen Davidson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>; Dean Coclin <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>; CABFPub <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: RE: Pre-ballot on membership requirement update > > I previously pointed out that “The Age of Certificate Data” section was > “inadvertently” moved to be under “3.3.1 Identification and Authentication > for Routine Re-key” when we reformatted the document. This seems inaccurate. > > Ryan recommended moving it to section 4.2.1, between the paragraphs > "Applicant information MUST" and "The CA SHALL develop", which looks to be > the right place. I doubt this would be controversial and is just the > movement of one paragraph from one section to another. Maybe you can > consider this change in the next clean-up ballot? > > Doug > > <> > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On > Behalf Of Stephen Davidson > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 11:42 AM > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Dean Coclin > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; CABFPub > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Pre-ballot on membership requirement update > > The wildcard clarification is one; and I don’t think it’s controversial. > > > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On > Behalf Of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 12:38 PM > To: Dean Coclin <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; > CABFPub <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Pre-ballot on membership requirement update > > Dean, Trend Micro will endorse. But can we combine with some of the other > non-controversial BR changes that have been circulating (I can’t remember > what they are) in a “miscellaneous” ballot? > > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On > Behalf Of Dean Coclin > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 8:29 AM > To: CABFPub > Subject: [cabfpub] Pre-ballot on membership requirement update > > I am looking for 2 endorsers for the following: > > Background: > Section 2.1 (a)(1) says that Issuing CAs “actively issue certificates to Web > servers…” > > Section 2.1(b) of the bylaws lists the items needed in a membership > application by CAs. > But that section does not ask the CA applicant to provide a 3rd party website > where the CA/B Forum can validate that they are actively issuing certs to web > servers. We do however ask the applicant this question, after they have > submitted their application. It would be helpful to have this in the bylaws > so we don’t have to go back and ask every time. > > Specific change: > > Add under 2.1(b) > (7) The URL of at least one third party website that is using a certificate > from the applicant’s CA which can be examined by Forum members > > Thanks, > Dean > > > TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE > The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential > and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. > If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or > disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or > telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. > > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public > <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public>
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
