On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:42 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public < [email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Tim, the changes seem to be in order. I have two suggestions. > > 1. Legacy WGs: If we delay this ballot for a couple of days and put it > for vote after October 3rd, the language around Legacy Working Groups will > be obsolete. I think it makes sense to wait a few days, remove section > 5.3.4 and language around LWG in section 5.2. > > This makes sense > > 1. Consistency with representation of numbers in duration references: > Sometimes, we use the text "7 days", sometimes we say "seven days" and > sometimes we say "seven (7) days". I recommend changing all references with > the format "seven (7) days". > > It seems we should separate editorial changes from functional changes - perhaps you'd be interested in proposing a separate ballot to align language.
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
