--> - We could score each vote (e.g. -2 for -1, -1 for -0, +1 for +0, +2 for +1) and then add up the votes. An obvious consensus could be something like a total of 0 or greater.
>From my perspective it complicates the 'consensus' Why not following: if there is -1 from core dev, then not implement it and if majority of the votes are +/-0 then maybe revisit the PUP and talk again since the team is like 'meh, not really motivated'. For obvious consensus i think most of the votes should be +1, because it shows that team members are motivated and inspired by the forthcoming changes, otherwise i don't see sense in pushing forward is there is no boost from the very beginning. -------- Regards, Ina Panova Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:13 PM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > I wanted to follow up after our meeting about what “obvious consensus" > means in PUP-1. As a refresher, here’s the relevant section in PUP-1: > > https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#deciding > > <https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#deciding>The term > about “obvious consensus” is vague—perhaps intentionally so. I’m wondering > if we want to clarify what it means. Given that we have numerical votes, we > could implement an algorithm for deciding what an obvious consensus means. > A couple examples: > > - At least X% of votes are +0 or +1 > - We could score each vote (e.g. -2 for -1, -1 for -0, +1 for +0, +2 for > +1) and then add up the votes. An obvious consensus could be something like > a total of 0 or greater. > > The other conditions (e.g. no -1 votes from pulp core devs) should still > apply I think. So even if there is an obvious consensus, the PUP wouldn’t > necessarily be approved. > > Thoughts? > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev