Having at least one +1 is not impartial approach just because the developer who , as you said, found the time for the research and writing down the proposal obviously will vote as +1 :)
-------- Regards, Ina Panova Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Austin Macdonald <amacd...@redhat.com> wrote: > This reminds me of the concept of a "Do-ocracy". > > If developers take the time to research and write up a proposal, they have > "done". It seems completely reasonable to default to the opinion of the > people that cared enough to do the work. If it isn't the right decision, > then someone must actively block it, simple as that. > > I think the rule should be "PUP passes if we have at least one +1 and no > -1s". > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev