Mihai, I'm interested to hear how the testing goes between pulp_deb and the master branch of core (what will become 2.14). Also I want to check in on the version number. Do you expect pulp_deb to be released as version 1.5.1? That is what is currently in the spec file.
Thanks for all the testing and contribution! Brian On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote: > Mihai, > > both of the Tasks are added to the sprint, so they will be worked on asap. > > > > -------- > Regards, > > Ina Panova > Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. > > "Do not go where the path may lead, > go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Mihai Ibanescu <mihai.ibane...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We have had discussions on the IRC channel about adding pulp-deb (debian >> support for pulp) in 2.14. >> >> I have filed this: >> >> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2802 >> >> The unit tests pass against the master branch. I am in the process of >> installing a server from master to validate that things do indeed work as >> expected. >> >> I believe we need consensus that we should do it, and figure out what >> needs to be done and who will do that. At the very least, python-debpkgr >> would need to be packaged as an rpm and included in the yum repo (subtask >> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2803) >> >> Thank you! >> Mihai >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
