Testing on a pulp server with pulp-server-2.14.0-0.1.alpha.git.18878.518e345.fc24.noarch (and its friends):
pulp-admin deb repo create --repo-id test-1-deb pulp-admin deb repo uploads deb --repo-id test-1-deb -f nscd_2.24-7ubuntu2_amd64.deb pulp-admin deb repo publish run --repo-id test-1-deb Confirmed a debian repo got created. URL=https://my-server.example.com/pulp/deb/test-1-deb/ pulp-admin deb repo create --repo-id test-2-deb --feed $URL --verify-feed-ssl false --relative-url top/test-2-deb pulp-admin deb repo sync run --repo-id test-2-deb Conformed a repo got created. pulp-admin deb repo delete --repo-id test-1-deb pulp-admin deb repo delete --repo-id test-2-deb I call that a success! :-) On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> wrote: > Great. For now, we're just doing scratch builds to ensure things can be > built without issue. Whatever version is merged when the 2.14 beta goes to > be made[0] (tentatively July 5) is what will ship with 2.14 unless you tell > us otherwise. > > Thanks Mihai! > > [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/2140_Release_Status > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Mihai Ibanescu <mihai.ibane...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> As of now, 1.5.1 is what I am expecting. >> >> However, there are some very good contributions as PRs in the pipe, and >> if I were to merge them they would probably result in 1.6. >> >> Mihai >> >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Mihai, I'm interested to hear how the testing goes between pulp_deb and >>> the master branch of core (what will become 2.14). Also I want to check in >>> on the version number. Do you expect pulp_deb to be released as version >>> 1.5.1? That is what is currently in the spec file. >>> >>> Thanks for all the testing and contribution! >>> Brian >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Mihai, >>>> >>>> both of the Tasks are added to the sprint, so they will be worked on >>>> asap. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -------- >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Ina Panova >>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. >>>> >>>> "Do not go where the path may lead, >>>> go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Mihai Ibanescu < >>>> mihai.ibane...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> We have had discussions on the IRC channel about adding pulp-deb >>>>> (debian support for pulp) in 2.14. >>>>> >>>>> I have filed this: >>>>> >>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2802 >>>>> >>>>> The unit tests pass against the master branch. I am in the process of >>>>> installing a server from master to validate that things do indeed work as >>>>> expected. >>>>> >>>>> I believe we need consensus that we should do it, and figure out what >>>>> needs to be done and who will do that. At the very least, python-debpkgr >>>>> would need to be packaged as an rpm and included in the yum repo (subtask >>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2803) >>>>> >>>>> Thank you! >>>>> Mihai >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev