+1 here too On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 8:28 AM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I think this makes sense. +1 from me. > > > David > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> As we get to the end of the MVP planning for Pulp3, I want to check-in >> about deferring 3 areas of Pulp functionality to the 3.1+ page [0]. I'm >> looking for feedback, especially -1s, about deferring the following 3 >> things from the Pulp 3.0 release. This would finalize a few still-red or >> totally missing areas of the MVP [1]. >> >> - Consumer Applicability. Pulp3 won't manage consumers, but Pulp is still >> in a good position to offer applicability. Katello uses it significantly, >> but they won't be using the 3.0 release. >> >> - Lazy downloading. I think this should be a top 3.1 priority. It will >> take a significant effort to update/test/release the streamer so I don't >> think we can include it in 3.0 for practical timeline reasons. >> >> - Content Protection. I believe we want both basic auth and key based >> verification of content served by the Pulp content app. This is an easy >> feature to add, but not one I think we should plan fully or do as part of >> the 3.0 MVP. >> >> Please send thoughts or ideas on these changes soon, so we can finalize >> the MVP document in the next few days. >> >> [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/31+_Ideas_(post_MVP) >> [1]: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Pulp_3_Minimum_Viabl >> e_Product/ >> >> Thank you, >> Brian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev