+1 On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Jeff Ortel <jor...@redhat.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On 12/12/2017 10:47 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote: > > As we get to the end of the MVP planning for Pulp3, I want to check-in > about deferring 3 areas of Pulp functionality to the 3.1+ page [0]. I'm > looking for feedback, especially -1s, about deferring the following 3 > things from the Pulp 3.0 release. This would finalize a few still-red or > totally missing areas of the MVP [1]. > > - Consumer Applicability. Pulp3 won't manage consumers, but Pulp is still > in a good position to offer applicability. Katello uses it significantly, > but they won't be using the 3.0 release. > > - Lazy downloading. I think this should be a top 3.1 priority. It will > take a significant effort to update/test/release the streamer so I don't > think we can include it in 3.0 for practical timeline reasons. > > - Content Protection. I believe we want both basic auth and key based > verification of content served by the Pulp content app. This is an easy > feature to add, but not one I think we should plan fully or do as part of > the 3.0 MVP. > > Please send thoughts or ideas on these changes soon, so we can finalize > the MVP document in the next few days. > > [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/31+_Ideas_(post_MVP) > <https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/31+_Ideas_%28post_MVP%29> > [1]: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Pulp_3_Minimum_ > Viable_Product/ > > Thank you, > Brian > > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing > listPulp-dev@redhat.comhttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev