On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Dennis, > thank you for sending out the summary of our meeting. > > Just to highlight and check the overall understanding - there will be one > repository per Y pulp release which might contain multiple Z and Y plugin > version releases. > Correct me if i am wrong. > > That is correct. > What would be our next steps in terms of collaboration with the build team? > > > My understanding was that Patrick is planning to do some investigation and report back on this thread. Please correct me if I am wrong. > > -------- > Regards, > > Ina Panova > Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. > > "Do not go where the path may lead, > go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Dennis Kliban <dkli...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Earlier today a few of us met to discuss how we can release new Y >> releases of plugins without a Y release of the platform accompanying them. >> >> The initial proposal was to publish a new Y release of a plugin at the >> same time as a Z release of platform and other plugins. More concretely, we >> were discussing putting pulp-docker-* 3.2.0 packages into the 2.16 >> repository[0]. This repository currently contains 3.1.3 packages. >> Publishing 3.2.0 packages to this repository would completely remove the >> 3.1.3 pulp-docker packages. Since 3.1.3 pulp-docker-* packages were only >> published to the 2.16 repository, the only 3.1.z package available after a >> publish of 3.2.0 would be 3.1.2 in the 2.15 repository[1]. After >> identifying this problem, we decided to NOT release pulp-docker-* 3.2.0 >> with the 2.16.2 z-stream release. >> >> In order to eliminate this problem in the future, we would like to >> investigate if it will be possible to compose repositories with new Y >> releases of plugins while retaining the previous versions of packages that >> were already published to the repository before. If this is possible, we >> would try to start composing our Z stream repositories in such a way >> starting with 2.17.0 release. >> >> Questions? Thoughts? Ideas? >> >> >> [0] https://repos.fedorapeople.org/pulp/pulp/stable/2.16/7Server/x86_64/ >> [1] https://repos.fedorapeople.org/pulp/pulp/stable/2.15/7Server/x86_64/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev