While there is a process for revising PUPs before they are accepted[0], we don’t have any process for revising PUPs after they are accepted. I’d like to upate PUP-1[1] to create a simple but formal process for revising accepted PUPs.
I was thinking we should add a section (“Revising an Accepted PUP”) that says say revising a PUP follows the same process as creating a new PUP. This includes an initial discussion period followed by a PR against the PUP with the proposed change. After that, there should be a vote decided by our existing lazy consensus model. Thoughts? [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#revision [1] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md David
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
