+1
-------- Regards, Ina Panova Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Dana Walker <dawal...@redhat.com> wrote: > +1 > > Dana Walker > > Associate Software Engineer > > Red Hat > > <https://www.redhat.com> > <https://red.ht/sig> > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Milan Kovacik <mkova...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey David, >>> >>> thanks, +1 >>> >>> -- >>> milan >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:49 PM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I’ve opened a PR with the process on how to revise a PUP. >>>> Reviews/feedback are welcome: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/11 >>>> >>>> I’d also like to call a vote on this proposed change. Here’s the voting >>>> model from PUP-1: >>>> >>>> +1: "Will benefit the project and should definitely be adopted." >>>> +0: "Might benefit the project and is acceptable." >>>> -0: "Might not be the right choice but is acceptable." >>>> -1: "I have serious reservations that need to be thought through and >>>> addressed." >>>> >>>> Deadline will be July 22, 2018. >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 11:14 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> While there is a process for revising PUPs before they are >>>>> accepted[0], we don’t have any process for revising PUPs after they are >>>>> accepted. I’d like to upate PUP-1[1] to create a simple but formal process >>>>> for revising accepted PUPs. >>>>> >>>>> I was thinking we should add a section (“Revising an Accepted PUP”) >>>>> that says say revising a PUP follows the same process as creating a new >>>>> PUP. This includes an initial discussion period followed by a PR against >>>>> the PUP with the proposed change. After that, there should be a vote >>>>> decided by our existing lazy consensus model. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#revision >>>>> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md >>>>> >>>>> David >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev