Thanks for bringing this up. I put some responses inline. On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 4:22 PM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote:
> One of the things that may not make sense anymore is how we document and > track issues for pulp-smash tests given that these tests no longer reside > in the pulp-smash repo. Currently, all the test-related issues are tracked > here[0]. > > With the tests no longer in the pulp-smash repo, I wonder if it makes > sense to maybe move them somewhere else like into redmine for Pulp 3 (or > the pulp-2-tests[1] repo for Pulp 2). > +1 to moving issues about the testing of a plugin to that plugin's tracker > The other question is about documentation. Currently the pulp-smash test > documentation is hosted on RTD (e.g. https://pulp-2-tests. > readthedocs.io/en/latest/). Should this documentation live alongside the > core/plugin docs? > I think this is fine where it is. pulp2 is going into maintenance mode at some point here soon. > QE would like to hear feedback as to how to proceed by August 20, 2018 so > please respond by then. > > Thanks. > > [0] https://github.com/pulpqe/pulp-smash/issues > [1] https://github.com/PulpQE/Pulp-2-Tests > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev