> > I think this is fine where it is. pulp2 is going into maintenance mode at > some point here soon.
That makes sense for the Pulp 2 smash test docs, but it's still a problem if we want to have smash test docs for Pulp 3 (which, we do) On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks for bringing this up. I put some responses inline. > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 4:22 PM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> One of the things that may not make sense anymore is how we document and >> track issues for pulp-smash tests given that these tests no longer reside >> in the pulp-smash repo. Currently, all the test-related issues are tracked >> here[0]. >> >> With the tests no longer in the pulp-smash repo, I wonder if it makes >> sense to maybe move them somewhere else like into redmine for Pulp 3 (or >> the pulp-2-tests[1] repo for Pulp 2). >> > +1 to moving issues about the testing of a plugin to that plugin's tracker > > >> The other question is about documentation. Currently the pulp-smash test >> documentation is hosted on RTD (e.g. https://pulp-2-tests.rea >> dthedocs.io/en/latest/). Should this documentation live alongside the >> core/plugin docs? >> > I think this is fine where it is. pulp2 is going into maintenance mode at > some point here soon. > > >> QE would like to hear feedback as to how to proceed by August 20, 2018 so >> please respond by then. >> >> Thanks. >> >> [0] https://github.com/pulpqe/pulp-smash/issues >> [1] https://github.com/PulpQE/Pulp-2-Tests >> >> David >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
