+1 I like the clarification to the removal piece. You may accept the suggestions if they are helpful.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 9:32 AM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > Assuming there are no major changes to the PUP, I’ll vote +1. > > Thanks for putting this together. > > David > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 7:21 AM Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> PR updated, >> ready for re-review. >> >> >> >> -------- >> Regards, >> >> Ina Panova >> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. >> >> "Do not go where the path may lead, >> go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >> >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> I have opened a PR for PUP-6 [0] which describes the commit bit >>> assignment/revocation process. >>> >>> Please take a look to review and provide feedback. >>> >>> I'd like to call for a vote by August 28, 2018. Per PUP-1[1], are the >>> voting options: >>> >>> +1: "Will benefit the project and should definitely be adopted." >>> +0: "Might benefit the project and is acceptable." >>> -0: "Might not be the right choice but is acceptable." >>> -1: "I have serious reservations that need to be thought through and >>> addressed." >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/15 >>> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md >>> -------- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Ina Panova >>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. >>> >>> "Do not go where the path may lead, >>> go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
