+1 to pulp-api. Perhaps one day in the far, far future our descendants will find some better API format than REST and we can spare them the pain from having to rename the ‘pulp-rest-api’ service.
David On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:48 AM Dennis Kliban <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:34 AM Eric Helms <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> Within Pulp 3, I've found myself struggling to refer to the pieces of the >> runtime deployment and wanted to raise a few questions I keep coming back >> to. >> >> 1) Per [1], pulpcore seems to reference the entirety of the server, >> workers and resource manager that live within the repository at [2]. Is >> that correct? >> > > Yes, that is what pulpcore means. > > >> 2) What is the 'server' called? I keep wanting to call it the >> 'pulp-api-server' or 'pulp-api-app' or 'pulp-api'. >> >> > I like the name pulp-rest-api or pulp-api. > > >> >> - Eric >> >> [1] >> https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/glossary.html#term-pulpcore >> [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
