Thanks for the feedback. I should know this, but if I wanted to propose an official change to the nomenclature what is the correct process?
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:47 AM Dennis Kliban <dkli...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:34 AM Eric Helms <ehe...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> Within Pulp 3, I've found myself struggling to refer to the pieces of the >> runtime deployment and wanted to raise a few questions I keep coming back >> to. >> >> 1) Per [1], pulpcore seems to reference the entirety of the server, >> workers and resource manager that live within the repository at [2]. Is >> that correct? >> > > Yes, that is what pulpcore means. > > >> 2) What is the 'server' called? I keep wanting to call it the >> 'pulp-api-server' or 'pulp-api-app' or 'pulp-api'. >> >> > I like the name pulp-rest-api or pulp-api. > > >> >> - Eric >> >> [1] >> https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/glossary.html#term-pulpcore >> [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
