+1 to making them aware. Pulp will likely be used in the SUSE community as well, so it could be confusing for SUSE users.
If they still want to keep that name, that is perfectly ok (to me). On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:58 AM Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com> wrote: > A user on IRC pointed out that there is a new-ish C library by SUSE named > libpulp. > > https://github.com/SUSE/libpulp > > Since it's a C library and contains no Python, there is no PyPI name > conflict like there we had with PuLP, and I don't particularly see a need > to ask them to rename their project. But I'm wondering what others think. > Should we contact them just to let them know? > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
