We recently made a change to the automation so that it would start checking projects and currently it's set up to check for the Pulp redmine project for pulpcore changes[0]. So currently the answer would be yes. However, we could change the commit validation to check for multiple projects.
[0] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/blob/master/template_config.yml#L38 David On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 9:27 AM Dennis Kliban <dkli...@redhat.com> wrote: > I am +1 to creating a new redmine project. > > I want to point out that we plan to move installer documentation into the > main pulpcore docs. Our CI checks for issues associated with the > appropriate projects. Do that mean we will need to create docs issues in > the Pulp project when the docs need to be updated for the installer? > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:25 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Cool. If we go down this path, would this plan make sense? >> >> 1. Create an installer project in redmine >> 2. Move over all issues (opened and closed) to this project that are >> tagged "Pulp 3 installer" >> 3. Remove the "Pulp 3 installer" tag >> >> David >> >> >> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabricio Aguiar < >> fabricio.agu...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 for creating a new project, >>> Installer query: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/issues?query_id=154 >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Fabricio Aguiar >>> Software Engineer, Pulp Project >>> Red Hat Brazil - Latam <https://www.redhat.com/> >>> +55 11 999652368 >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:48 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> During triage today, a majority of the issues that came up were for the >>>> installer but only a handful of people could really speak to these issues. >>>> I proposed that we skip these issues during triage and let the installer >>>> team triage them. >>>> >>>> In order to do so, we'd have to create a separate project in redmine. >>>> My initial feeling is that this makes sense since the installer work has >>>> really grown into its own project and is no longer in the purview of >>>> pulpcore. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> I'll put a deadline on this discussion for May 8 unless we don't reach >>>> a consensus by then. >>>> >>>> David >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
