+1 to the plan. (We discussed this at PulpCon too, and concluded this.)
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 9:55 AM Brian Bouterse <bmbou...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:48 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> During triage today, a majority of the issues that came up were for the >> installer but only a handful of people could really speak to these issues. >> I proposed that we skip these issues during triage and let the installer >> team triage them. >> > I agree with this observation, a triage where not everyone can speak to > issues isn't a good use of time. Overall I wonder if having an all-hands > triage makes sense anymore given the mini-teams organization these days. > >> >> In order to do so, we'd have to create a separate project in redmine. My >> initial feeling is that this makes sense since the installer work has >> really grown into its own project and is no longer in the purview of >> pulpcore. >> > What about us reconfiguring the triage query to disinclude issues with the > installer tag on them as an alternative? > > >> Thoughts? >> >> I'll put a deadline on this discussion for May 8 unless we don't reach a >> consensus by then. >> >> David >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > -- Mike DePaulo He / Him / His Service Reliability Engineer, Pulp Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> IM: mikedep333 GPG: 51745404 <https://www.redhat.com/>
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
