Hi, Pulp does support EL5 platforms. The trick is that you have to specify the checksum during the upload of RPM content units. Pulp treats files with a different checksum as completely different entities. Use the "pulp-admin rpm repo uploads rpm --checksum-type sha ..." for uploading the package for RHEL5. This allows you to override the default checksum type of sha256 whenever you upload an RPM. Upload the same rpm twice, once with --checksum-type sha for your el5 repo and once without the option specified or specified as sha256 for your EL6 repo. Regards,
Barnaby ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philipp Gassmann" <gassm...@puzzle.ch> To: "Martin Collins" <martin.coll...@framestore.com>, "Christina Plummer" <cplum...@gmail.com>, "Barnaby Court" <bco...@redhat.com> Cc: pulp-list@redhat.com Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 4:51:57 AM Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] Repo configured to use SHA checksums, but uploaded packages still get SHA256 Thanks for the replys! Unfortuately those workarounds are not really usable if you need to upload packages to existing repos for EL5 and EL6. I migrated the EL5 repos from pulp_v1 by initially syncing from those repos. Now I need to add additional packages to those repositories. I'm quite disappointed to find out that Pulp 2 does support repositories for EL5, even though RHEL 5 is listed as supported Platform. http://www.pulpproject.org/ Supported Platforms: Fedora 18, Fedora 19, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 The sha256 is still hardcoded: https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/blob/master/extensions_admin/pulp_rpm/extensions/admin/upload/package.py The checksumtype is a repository option so the checksum should not be different for different packages of the same repository. Pulp 1 had the command to generate the metadata. Pulp 2 has the publish command which has a stage "generating metadata", there the checksum should be created. Am I wrong on that? Why does pulp 2.4 add an option "--checksum-type" to the upload command? Shouln't it use the repository checksum-type option? What is the checksum-type option of the repository for? pulp-admin rpm repo update --repo-id centos.5.x86_64.custom --checksum-type=sha1 Id: centos.5.i386.updates Display Name: centos.5.i386.updates Description: Last checked by Puppet on Tue Jun 17 06:43:30 CEST 2014 Content Unit Counts: Rpm: 408 Notes: Importers: Config: Feed: http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/centos/5/updates/i386/ Id: yum_importer Importer Type Id: yum_importer Last Sync: 2014-05-21T11:54:49+02:00 Repo Id: centos.5.i386.updates Scheduled Syncs: Distributors: Auto Publish: True Config: Checksum Type: sha1 Http: True Https: True Relative URL: centos.5.i386.updates Distributor Type Id: yum_distributor Id: yum_distributor Last Publish: 2014-05-21T11:55:24+02:00 Repo Id: centos.5.i386.updates Scheduled Publishes: The Bug Report is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004580 Am 16.06.2014 23:37, schrieb Martin Collins: > My workaround (as I have a large number of rhel6 and only a few for > rhel5) was to just sync from a file:/// feed URL for rhel5 then just put > the rpms in that dir, createrepo -s sha, then sync and continue normally > from there > > Cheers > Martin > > On 16 Jun 2014 22:33, "Christina Plummer" <cplum...@gmail.com > <mailto:cplum...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi Philipp, > > My workaround was to modify the upload/package.py and explicitly > force it to use "sha" instead of "sha256". On my system, the file > was > > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pulp_rpm/extension/admin/upload/package.py > . See attached diff. > > Be sure to set aside the package.pyc and package.pyo files as well, > and restart httpd. Then delete and re-upload the package to your repos. > > Belated public thanks to Ryan Bowlby for the pointer on this one. > > Christina > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Philipp Gassmann > <gassm...@puzzle.ch <mailto:gassm...@puzzle.ch>> wrote: > > Hello Christina > > I just stumbled over the same issue. I uploaded the same noarch > package > to multiple repositories. now the installation of the package on > CentOS > 5 fails because of the wrong checksum. > > Did you find a solution or workaround? > I can install the package if I download it manually and install > it with > yum --nogpgcheck. > > Regards, > Philipp > > > Am 11.03.2014 14:26, schrieb Christina Plummer: > > Hi Barnaby, > > > > Thanks for your note. Unfortunately, --checksum-type doesn't > seem to be > > an option for the "pulp-admin rpm repo uploads rpm" command: > > > > CWC\cplummer1@cbigdc-rhel6test ~ $ pulp-admin rpm repo uploads rpm > > --repo-id=q1-ol5-x86_64 --file > oracle-validated-1.0.0-34.el5.x86_64.rpm > > --checksum-type sha > > Command: rpm > > Description: uploads one or more RPMs into a repository > > > > Available Arguments: > > > > --repo-id - (required) unique identifier; only > alphanumeric, ., > > -, and _ > > allowed > > --file, -f - full path to a file to upload; may be > specified multiple > > times for multiple files > > --dir, -d - full path to a directory containing files > to upload; > > may be > > specified multiple times for multiple > directories > > -v - display extra information about the upload > process > > --skip-existing - if specified, RPMs that already exist on > the server > > will not > > be uploaded > > The following options were specified but do not exist on the > command: > > --checksum-type > > > > I am using the RPMs for 2.3.1-1. Shouldn't it default to the > > checksum-type for the repository, if specified? > > > > Thanks, > > Christina > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Barnaby Court > <bco...@redhat.com <mailto:bco...@redhat.com> > > <mailto:bco...@redhat.com <mailto:bco...@redhat.com>>> wrote: > > > > Christina, > > > > The checksum on the RPM is set at upload time. Was > "--checksum-type > > SHA1" set on the "pulp-admin rpm repo uploads rpm" > command? If no > > checksum type is specified it defaults to SHA256. > > > > Regards, > > Barnaby > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Christina Plummer" <cplum...@gmail.com > <mailto:cplum...@gmail.com> > > <mailto:cplum...@gmail.com <mailto:cplum...@gmail.com>>> > > To: pulp-list@redhat.com <mailto:pulp-list@redhat.com> > <mailto:pulp-list@redhat.com <mailto:pulp-list@redhat.com>> > > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 1:42:14 PM > > Subject: [Pulp-list] Repo configured to use SHA checksums, > but > > uploaded packages still get SHA256 > > > > On Pulp 2.1.3, I had run into issues with sha256 checksums > being > > created for some of the repo metadata files, even though > the repo > > was configured to use sha instead. > > > > On Pulp 2.3.1, this seems to have been fixed... however, I > am now > > seeing that packages manually uploaded into a repo are > still getting > > a sha256 checksum in the repodata, which means that RHEL5/OL5 > > clients can't handle them. Packages that were synced, or > copied from > > another repository, have the correct checksum type. > > > > OS: RHEL 6.5 x86_64 > > Pulp: 2.3.1-1 (RPMs from Pulp repo) > > Steps to reproduce: > > 1. Created "live" repo fed from Oracle public yum > repositories, > > checksum-type=sha, retain-old-count=1 > > 2. Created "q1" repo, checksum-type=sha > > 3. Copied rpms from "live" to "q1 > > 4. Deleted "known-broken" versions of > oracle-validated-1.1.0 package > > 5. Uploaded "known-working" version of > oracle-validated-1.0.0 package > > 6. Published repo. Every package except for > oracle-validated-1.0.0 > > has a 'sha' checksum; oracle-validated-1.0.0 alone has a > 'sha256' > > checksum. > > > > Is this a bug? > > > > Thanks, > > Christina > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pulp-list mailing list > > Pulp-list@redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-list@redhat.com> > <mailto:Pulp-list@redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-list@redhat.com>> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pulp-list mailing list > > Pulp-list@redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-list@redhat.com> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list > > > > > -- > Philipp Gassmann > > Puzzle ITC GmbH > http://www.puzzle.ch > > Telefon +41 31 370 22 00 <tel:%2B41%2031%20370%2022%2000> > Werfen Sie einen Blick in unseren Blog: > http://www.puzzle.ch/blog > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-list mailing list > Pulp-list@redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-list@redhat.com> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list > -- Philipp Gassmann Puzzle ITC GmbH http://www.puzzle.ch Telefon +41 31 370 22 00 Direkt +41 31 370 22 02 Fax +41 31 370 22 01 Werfen Sie einen Blick in unseren Blog: http://www.puzzle.ch/blog _______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list Pulp-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list