Bradley Davis wrote:
> It makes it seems that pulp_resource_manager and pulp_celerybeat should
> not be running on the child node server. When looking at the Nodes
> chapter, neither services are mentioned.

Hello Brad!

Apologies for the confusion. Each node is a complete Pulp installation
that is largely independent of the other (aside from it's ability to
synchronize content). Thus, each node should have exactly one resource
manager and one celerybeat running. Hope that helps!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

Reply via email to