Bradley Davis wrote: > Do you think it would be worthwhile to add that note into the > documentation? Or add a clarification to the general installation > chapter as well as the nodes chapter? Numerous people on my team read it > the same way, where resource manager and celerybeat were not to be run > on more than one node?
That's a good suggestion. Would you be willing to submit a pull request against our documentation? It's kept here: https://github.com/pulp/pulp/tree/2.6-release/docs If you branch from the 2.6-release branch, and submit the pull request into that same branch, it will go live as soon as it is merged. If you don't have time to do that, filing a bug report against the documentation would also be welcome. Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list Pulp-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
