On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 09:56:04AM -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote: > you guys are thinking a three month time based cadence?
That is the current proposal. We discussed it during a meeting last week and it was suggested that something between 3 and 6 months would work well. We can always adjust if we find that it is too short (I doubt we'll think it's too long ☺). What do you think? -- Randy Barlow irc: bowlofeggs
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list Pulp-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
