Will there be an "LTS-like" version released periodically for stable production use? I mean, I get that it's not a supported product like Satellite 6, but since I'm planning to use it in production I'd like to be able to stick with a single version for about 12 months without feeling like I need to upgrade every 3 months to address any issues that pop up.
But then again the upgrade process from 2.7 --> 2.8 was such a breeze maybe I should just get over my annual upgrade habit that has come from the cadence of Satellite 5.x releases. - Kodiak On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Randy Barlow <rbar...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 09:56:04AM -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote: > > you guys are thinking a three month time based cadence? > > That is the current proposal. We discussed it during a meeting last week > and it was suggested that something between 3 and 6 months would work > well. We can always adjust if we find that it is too short (I doubt > we'll think it's too long ☺). > > What do you think? > > -- > Randy Barlow > irc: bowlofeggs > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-list mailing list > Pulp-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list Pulp-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
