19.11.2014 11:08, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
19.11.2014 10:49, David Henningsson wrote:
If possible, it would make more sense to improve the library of our
choice (probably speex) to support our needs, instead of rewriting a new
resampler from scratch. That way, other apps using that resampler could
also benefit from our improvements to that resampler.
In general I'd agree, but that assumes that such improvements are
welcome upstream. Which is not a given. In fact, if I were an upstream
of any resampler, I'd reject such patch on the basis that pulseaudio
is the only program that needs it, and that I won't regularly test the
new functionality and won't notice if it breaks.
Still, it does make sense to ask. Will do so for speex.
Done: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2014-November/008523.html
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
