On 10/06/2009 08:30 AM, Peter Onion wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 23:01 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Uh. F10. That's quite old. PA is very much in flux, I'd not suggest
users using old versions like that.
If you ask me, especially developers should live on the bleeding edge,
But that doesn't make sense if you are developing real applications.
Real users are seldom on the edge and if your code has to work for them
being a bit behind the curve makes more sense I think.
Anyway I'm now on F11 .
so if you don't want to go all the way to rawhide (what I'd
recommend), then at least make sure to run the latest released
version.
I'm just building 0.9.19, but it's failed on the version of sndfile.
Requested 'sndfile>= 1.0.20' but version of sndfile is 1.0.17
If I'm going to have to upgrade lots of other packages I'm afraid it's a
show stopper for my attempt to integrate with pulseaudio properly.
I've got people lined up to test my applications and I can't expect them
to manually upgrade their machines if the current versions of packages
in their chosen distribution are too old.
Fair point. For that issues above I just compiled libsndfile from
source. I think it was the only dep that had changed from the standard
Fedora packages.
Cheers.
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de
https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
