Issue #2658 has been updated by R.I. Pienaar aka Volcane.
Nigel Kersten wrote: > Yeah, I forgot to put that into my suggested syntax, you'd need to define > relationships, but why not re-use our existing syntax for that? > > [...] > this sounds ideal, I was thinking to just make the stages classes - empty ones - that we can just use like normal today that would make it very easy for people to grok what they do ---------------------------------------- Feature #2658: Add puppet "run stages" http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/2658 Author: Robin Bowes Status: Needs design decision Priority: Normal Assigned to: Luke Kanies Category: Target version: Affected version: 0.25.0 Keywords: Branch: Sometimes, there are certain specific manifests that you want to run before all others. Similarly, there may be others that you want to run after all others have finished. I'd like to see support for this added to puppet. By default, all manifests would be "run" in the "main" stage. However, all types would support an additional parameter: stage => 'pre' or stage => 'post. Anything labelled as "pre" would be executed first, followed by anything labelled "main" or with no explicit stage, then finally anything labelled "post". The stages could even be user-defined by specifying them in some config file, eg: [stages] default=main 1=pre 2=main 3=post Any support for this sort of idea? -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/my/account -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en.
