Issue #4146 has been updated by Jeff Weiss.

Assignee set to Jeff Weiss
Keywords set to nagios module

I think I understand what the goal here is, but it's always good to clarify.

We're taking the various nagios types <code>[nagios_command, nagios_contact, 
nagios_contactgroup, ... , nagios_timeperiod]</code> and moving them from--a 
Ruby definition in--Puppet proper to a module--defined using the Puppet 
language--that will be available (via the forge?), yes? 

I'm worried about a breaking change if we have all the nagios types in a single 
module. Because of what's in [Defined Types in Modules 
documentation](http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/definedtypes.html#defined-types-in-modules)
 about each module type being namespaced, won't we end up with 
[nagios::command, nagios::contact, nagios::contactgroup, ... , 
nagios::timeperiod] as the new types, breaking manifests that had previously 
used the _ version?

I think we can make a separate module for each of the commands that will 
maintain manifest continuity, but that's 14 separate modules, which doesn't 
seem ideal either.
----------------------------------------
Refactor #4146: Move Nagios types and supporting from core to a module
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4146#change-57995

Author: James Turnbull
Status: Accepted
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Jeff Weiss
Category: nagios
Target version: 2.7.x
Affected Puppet version: 0.25.5
Keywords: nagios module
Branch: 


As description says.


-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, 
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: 
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/my/account

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Bugs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en.

Reply via email to