On May 28, 2009, at 3:30 AM, Bart Vanbrabant wrote:
> >> To what extent do you think this makes sense for inclusion? That is, >> did you do this as a form of research, or did you do it because you >> thought it provided a solution to a key shortcoming in Puppet? >> >> I'm disappointed I can't read Dutch, as I'd quite like to know what >> kind of research your thesis included around this topic. I haven't >> spent much time on theory and Puppet recently, but if someone else is >> I'd definitely like to take advantage of it. :) > > What I tried to achieve in my master thesis was managing > infrastructure at a much higher abstraction level. In my case web > infrastructure. My thesis advisor was Thomas Delaet why wrote the > PoDIM paper at lisa07. The conflicthandlers were one of the changes I > made to puppet. The biggest change was a 'create rule' like feature > that PoDIM also offers. > > Not everything I did is useful in a production tool. I'll try in the > next weeks when I find the time to posts the changes I made and why I > think Puppet could benefit from them. That would be great. This kind of thinking doesn't happen much, so I'd like to get everything I can out of it, especially if you found ways to provide what you needed. -- He played the king as if afraid someone else would play the ace. --John Mason Brown --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
