On 12/09/09 1:24, Luke Kanies wrote: > Hi all (but mostly Brice), > > I'm working on http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/2596 -- > extracting the class/define/node classes from AST classes -- and I > realize now that I don't need to extract them, I just need to move > them. There's essentially no AST behaviour left in them at all, so I > can just move them out. Except. > > The new AST docs stuff is still used and needed. So, I'm thinking of > converting that to a module or something (as opposed to it being > defined on the AST base class), so these non-AST classes can still > provide docs in the way that the AST stuff expects. > > Seem reasonable?
It seems so. One gotcha: puppetdoc rdoc parser is not covered by unit tests (this is on my todo list, but since this is several pages long it won't happen tomorrow), so we should properly test rdoc is not broken. -- Brice Figureau My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
