On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:21:15 -0700, Markus Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'd really like for #3366 to get on the list, as it's preventing us from >> migrating from 0.24.7 to 0.25.x > > Noted. > > I forgot to mention, as a general rule, if an issue is a blocker for > you be sure to vote for it (the green up arrow). We use that in our > did-we-miss-anything-people-care-about pass and it can help draw > attention to the things you care about. > >> I'll work on a test tonight and resubmit a patch based on Luke's snippet. > > Sounds great. Keep me posted & if you have any questions, don't > hesitate to ask. > > -- Markus
Michael and Rein were working with me on getting my patch for #2043 reviewed. Not sure if it's been thoroughly vetted yet, but if it can make the cut I'd love for it to be included in the next release. This has been a major issue for us, since we do run many RHEL4 x86_64 boxes (mostly for Oracle databases), so we do need to use puppet to validate both i386 and x86_64 packages. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
