On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:26:55 +0800 Ohad Levy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Todd Zullinger <[email protected]> wrote: > > I believe this makes using puppet on RHEL/CentOS 4 rather difficult. > > Fortunately, there don't seem to be that many folks doing so, as > > there were very few complaints when we had 0.25.x in epel-testing > > for a good month or so. > > > The only real option at the moment is to upgrade your ruby stack :-( > I have more than 600 RHE4 machines....... > Maybe could you help testing #2604 on a few of these nodes ? It seems to do the job for me. Interestingly, puppet even seems to run more efficiently with this patch: 0.25.4, same node, 3 times in a row: real 0m58.690s user 0m32.526s sys 0m11.985s real 0m56.096s user 0m31.346s sys 0m9.965s real 0m59.497s user 0m32.858s sys 0m12.829s bkearney/ticket/0.25.x/3379, same node, 3 times in a row: real 0m56.992s user 0m32.790s sys 0m11.757s real 0m55.428s user 0m31.606s sys 0m10.777s real 1m0.553s user 0m34.310s sys 0m13.545s MarkusQ/ticket/0.25.x/2604 + bkearney/ticket/0.25.x/3379, same node, 3 times in a row: real 0m48.345s user 0m21.369s sys 0m11.981s real 0m46.028s user 0m20.309s sys 0m11.381s real 0m46.643s user 0m20.357s sys 0m10.985s Marc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
